Why Load Balance?: Load Balancing is a decent alternative to the higher prices of ISDN equipment/service and the not-so-speedy performance of "56k" modems. It is a good fit for the growing number of users that already have a second line and are looking to increase their bandwidth, but do not want to invest in new and expensive telco technologies. A few quick notes: - In many markets, ISDN service is still too expensive to be realistic for the home user. (The hardware is $$ too). - "56k" modems are expensive and do not really provide anything close to the max "53k" connection. - ISP charges and restrictions on 56k modems are generally higher than standard dial-up. - Given that your ISP allows multiple logins, you need nothing more than standard dial-up service to an ISP (and shell account access). - In terms of raw throughput, Load Balancing is close (but not equal) to ISDN single BRI. Example: I can play RealAudio/Video ISDN single channel files easily over my 28.8k and 33.6k modem (they require about 45 kbps). - Load Balancing considerably outperforms "56k" modems. *Some of my standard transfer rates (According to Netscape spedometer): + Inline web grahpics - 6.4 - 6.5k bytes/sec + AVI and WAV transfers 7.0 - 7.2k bytes/sec + ZIP file downloads 5.6 - 6.0k bytes/sec + Text 12.0k ++ bytes/sec (Note these are 'eye balled' numbers. Nothing scientific about them). - Low cost. You only need a second phone and a second modem. Second phone lines are cheap ($20 a month in this market). "56k" modems have pushed the price of 33.6k modems down to around $50 dollars. _________________________________________________________________ The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of its author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by the University of St. Thomas. Authors assume responsibility and liability for the content of their documents. Send comments/feedback to csclub@csclub.stthomas.edu and matt@csclub.stthomas.edu