It was great to see you Bob, you just missed a man who "cornered me" at the mens room to tell me of Jane Hathaways car on the Beverly Hillbillies, I know but this dude was pretty strange looking and sounding, I let him babble on until you showed up! Can't wait till Sept. 1 then we can cruise I am going to have my Challenger at the Federal Penitentiary,(Where I retired from), this Sunday August 19, 2007. There is a Prison Car Show,(HorsePower Locked Up) I will see some of my old friends and the public is invited SunDay 10:00 Am till 5:00 PM More pics to follow. Hope they have a restroom!(Dave knows I dont do those things. Not anymore)jh27n0b wrote:Spent 2 days at the nats and did not get to see all of it. It was great to see you Eddie, even though for some reason you were hanging out at the entrance to the mens room. I agree that I also don't like the layout. It makes it very difficult to see everything. I noticed that attendance was down from previous years and I think and everyone else thinks it is because of the layout. Still there was a lot of beautiful cars. Well worth the trip. They did not have the original concept Challenger. Just the super stock version. I did meet and old buddy who works at the Auburn Hills Tech center. He saw several pre production Challengers in the "shop". He said that the grille is more 70 like than the concept. Still pre production and still just a rumor though. I can not wait for the Challenger to make its return. Feb/06/2008 11:00 am.
Bob
airfuelEddie wrote:Do you think I could go "bigger" with a different combo and still retain true street usage with a similar piston?
Thanks Fabian, I appreciate your advice! I have talked to Brandon and he basically stated exactly what you said. It wont be a problem for short term street usage. Lets face it, this beast isnt going to get more than 4-6 MPG when built and installed in a Bracket bomber A -body,(1976 Dart), so I may still go the 543 route!! It wont be driven more than 5-7k a year more like 2k! and we all know a larger engine is always better! Have you seen the new block he is coming out with in spring of 08? New Heads also, 899.00 complete so building a strong big engine will become "economical". I am still in the planning stages but have bought a 383 forged crank for blueprinting and am still measuring all surfaces and checking the mains for crankshaft alignment. The block goes to the machine shop next month for a sonic test and bore/hone with plates minimum amount for clean up. The entire engine will have to built using his parts as it's the most economical and the quality appears high. I just may go bigger! Do you have or ever heard of oil contamination or detonation from oil seepage from any of the 400/stroker's? External oil pick-up is no problem for my application, but thanks for the heads up on it.fbernard wrote:airfuelEddie wrote:Do you think I could go "bigger" with a different combo and still retain true street usage with a similar piston?
In my opinion, street usage is mainly due to camshaft and head choice.
Street usage and the position of the oil ring right in the pin area always seem to be a problem. I know I'd have gone to the biggest available kit (that's what I did, but by the time I had it assembled, the 512 was out, and now it's 528 and 543). But that's just me. I only drive 3 or 4k miles a year, maybe 5 on the big years.
I would say if the top rings are chosen with care, it should not be a problem. Stay safe anyway, and follow Brandon's advice, he has sold so many of his kits he must have a pretty good return on the various uses they get.
Besides, the bigger kits require oiling modifications (external pickups), and it's not worth the hassle for a street engine.
dave-r wrote:This was posted on the e-body message board a while ago. It got me thinking....