by Goldenblack440 » 25 Sep 2009 15:05
OK! I remember reading that, but then forgot when playing with the spreadsheet. I don't save it with the new figures anyway.
Yes i think it was pretty accurate, ie, the circumference reading matched the diameter input pretty closely to what i measured. But i put in actual measured figures and it did change the pinion result very slightly but only by 10ths, so in reality no real difference. Using it as it is supposed to be used, is very accurate. I changed my rear end from 2.76 to 3.55 and went from a 27 teeth to 35 tooth pinion by the calculator (told me to use 34.9 to 35.2 depending on my inputs). I havn't done a speedo check yet but will in the next few days and see how accurate it was.