Tim wrote:I get the impression, these devices only really work well with very high stall transmissions, which as you say would render the car next to useless for the street. But could you theoretically use a trans brake on a lower stall car, say 3200- 3500 rpm? And if so, would there be any point?
Of course you could use one with a friendlier converter, but what would be the use? You can foot-brake even a 4500 RPM converter.
The reason for the transbrake is simply bracket racing reliability : it's easier to achieve the same results, repeatedly, if you automate as much of the whole process as possible. Lifting your finger from the transbrake button is almost a binary process.
Lifting your foot from the brake pedal isn't.
You can even find setups where the driver releases the transbrake as soon as he sees the amber lights, and the Transbrake+rev limit deactivation is done through an electronic timer to work on the RT.
Think about the strain a transbrake puts on parts : the obvious conclusion is that you need a really big driveshaft, and a spool. A 2-stage rev-limiter is mandatory (or you manage engine RPM with your foot, which just about negates the repeatability factor. a triangulated 4-link or ladder bars also help assure that suspension travel is identical at every run.
In my opinion (but I'm absolutely no expert), the transbrake is one of the last steps on the road to street-unfriendliness...
The only cars I know in France which have a TB are all trailered to the strip.