


dave-r wrote:Good point Christer. But I would never attempt a wheel repair. Too dangerous.
 As always it is important to know what you are doing...
 As always it is important to know what you are doing...
 ) story. A friend of mine did choose to use a 8 3/4 Chrysler rear-axle in his ´66 Nova. (Good choise, eh?
 ) story. A friend of mine did choose to use a 8 3/4 Chrysler rear-axle in his ´66 Nova. (Good choise, eh?   ) He decided to shorten the rear-axle so that 12" rims would fit in. The thing was that he didn´t shorten the axle enough causing the rubber to slightly scratch against the rear fenders. Now what to? He used Centerlines and since they are quite thick (or very thick? I don´t remember exactly) in the area between the bolt washer and the dumbrake/discbrake suface, he decided to turn this area on the Centerlines and and making the area thinner. Well, it is nothing that I would recommend but it worked out well for him.
 ) He decided to shorten the rear-axle so that 12" rims would fit in. The thing was that he didn´t shorten the axle enough causing the rubber to slightly scratch against the rear fenders. Now what to? He used Centerlines and since they are quite thick (or very thick? I don´t remember exactly) in the area between the bolt washer and the dumbrake/discbrake suface, he decided to turn this area on the Centerlines and and making the area thinner. Well, it is nothing that I would recommend but it worked out well for him.   (Thank God.)
 (Thank God.)

christer wrote:I have read that it is possible to fix the enlarged bolt holes if you drill an oversized hole and then press in a tube.

bradburm wrote:I have the car up on stands and will pull the rear tire first. although all the Mag/wheel studs seemed tight and in place.
bradburm wrote:If this fixes the problem, then you are suggesting that the bolt hole on the cragar has probably hollowed out beyond normal?
bradburm wrote:These are very new wheels maybe 3 months and 500 miles, so I assume Cragar will warrant them?
bradburm wrote:I assume the next step would to replace the u-joints on the drive shaft??
Living next door to Year One?bradburm wrote:Would Year One have the U-Joints since they are right up thr road from me?
 What a privilage!
 What a privilage!   Congrats!
 Congrats!  
spitfire9137 wrote:A question for the experts, were the driveshafts balanced, Ive never payed attention to mine. If so could be possible the weight came off his driveshaft?

 
 

 
 



Jon wrote:Glad to hear you solved the problem.
 
 Jon wrote:Good insurance to replace them all as failure results in no brakes.
Jon wrote:There is one in the rear just above the axle also. For some reason they don't have a part number for that one on a 70 but I heard a 71 will work. Anyone know of this?
 
  


Jon wrote:I guess if the rear failed you would have most of the braking still functional.
Jon wrote:On the other hand if the fronts failed the rear tires would skid for quite a while.
Jon wrote:A leaking hose would allow everthing to work until there is no fluid in the plunger. It would be sudden. Petal to the floor??

dave-r wrote:Your best bet is to have some stainless braided hose made up to replace the stock hose. They do a better job as they make the line pressure higher.

 
 
 Anyway's my wife helped me out on this recent repair and the petel goes to the floor when the bleed valve is opened. So I think our ideas about partial braking from either the back or front system may be busted.
  Anyway's my wife helped me out on this recent repair and the petel goes to the floor when the bleed valve is opened. So I think our ideas about partial braking from either the back or front system may be busted.
 ??
 ??