by Goldenblack440 » 02 Sep 2009 13:00
Guys thanks heaps for the analysis. If you reckon it is too lean, then its even leaner now as i leaned off the cruise screw (that very small screw in the centre of the TQ). As you know from the previous post, i thought i had too much advance. By my timing light, with 16deg initial it showed 30deg at only 1500rpm and well over 36 at 3000. That is without vac advance. So for the whole trip over i ran no vac advance. Bit sluggish off the mark but didn't seem to worry it. In Sydney the fellow who built my TQ convinced me to put the vac advance back on for the trip back because i was complaining of the poor fuel consumption and he said it should improve it. It was a bit more lively off the mark but fuel consumption only improved about 5%. I got a worst of 14.9, best of 19.2 and average around 17-18mpg. I didn't recheck the timing after i connected it, but i did back off the initial about 4 degrees. It has about 40+ total now. I will not be recurving that dizzy until i put the 340 back in. But i intend to run MSD anyway.
Ed, that firing line you are talking about... i am not sure if it is what i have arrowed in the photos? These plugs are taken out after coming back and some stop-start and slow driving. Look how red they are. The one on the far left was quite wet too.
As for plug heat range, they are NGK BP5ES. A 6ES or EY will be colder. However i was told that a warmer plug better helps combustion of leaner mixtures? Anyway, if the line in the pictures is what you are talking about, then it is near the electrode, and therefore too retarded by your opinion. This is hard to believe with around 40 degrees of total!
-
- This one rather wet
-
-
- Is this the arc line?
-
- arc line ?
-
- very red this one
-
-