Posted: 24 Mar 2008 21:44
In that case Dave. I should just put Hirsch's primer coat and be done with it.dave-r wrote:I guess it depends what it is going to be fitted into.
http://challenger.mpoli.fi/board/
In that case Dave. I should just put Hirsch's primer coat and be done with it.dave-r wrote:I guess it depends what it is going to be fitted into.
She isnt allowed in my shop!Jimiboy wrote:I know.... Ask your wife Ed? They like to choose and decide stuff...
airfuelEddie wrote:I should explain, we have a lot of 'gentlemen' on this site and I wouldnt want them to get the wrong idea. She isnt' allowed in my shop, ever!!
As always I have to take my hat off to you guys that do this stuff in a place other than here in the u.s..ianandjess wrote:well eddie with all that work done its a lot cheaper than we'll ever get it done over here probably 1/2 the price so your in front of us when budget is concerned
cheers ian
You will be the first to know my friend!fbernard wrote:Eddie, when you have it all together, I'd like to know your choices in terms of intake manifold, injectors and injector location, fuel pump, fuel log, etc...
airfuelEddie wrote:I 'picked' the camshaft today. I am thinking this one, Fast Rate of Lift, 242/248 @ .050
Thanks Dave, I'll have to keep in mind the H.P. rating of that cam and my software I am using. I dont want the injectors to overwork or approach static conditions. This can cause a lean out and burn pistons or worse. I am 'looking' at 500-550 H.P. I know this doesnt sound like much but I want to establish a 'baseline' first then future mods like bigger cams, injectors, re-programming the fuel tables will follow. I appreciate your advice cause I'm 'charting' some new territory here with the Flex fuel capabilities so a smooth but good running tune will be a big advantage in my pursuit of a turn-key no fuss no muss engine that makes excellent torque and is a pleasure to drive. I'm kinda glad that Dave H. ended up giving me more ratio than I thought I needed, a blower/turbo would get complicated real fast and there is less of a room for error in the tune due to the increase in manifold pressure and heat. The basics still apply regardless of fuel/spark management and for this I need all the advice I can get!dave-r wrote:I would stick with that one Eddie. I think it will be OK. Very strong.
My own cam is 237/242 duration and sounds like its hot motor but still idles fine at 850rpm. Yours being 500 inches should work out about the same with that 242/248 cam.